{"id":1345,"date":"2023-07-02T11:48:48","date_gmt":"2023-07-02T11:48:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2023\/07\/02\/james-soriano-at-the-american-thinker\/"},"modified":"2023-07-02T11:48:48","modified_gmt":"2023-07-02T11:48:48","slug":"james-soriano-at-the-american-thinker","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2023\/07\/02\/james-soriano-at-the-american-thinker\/","title":{"rendered":"James Soriano at The American Thinker<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"

His latest on Ukraine is America's 'Revolutionary Moment.'<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

What follows is his response to the comments made here on his earlier article Do Not Underestimate Russia's Resolve<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n

I just read through the comments this weekend.  <\/span>There certainly was a spirited debate.  <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The comments divide into two kinds, with Michael Brazier and Dimitri raising points about how I\u2019ve mis-measured Russia\u2019s intent and its imperialistic history.  <\/span>Dimitri seemed to be somewhat surprised that a retired Foreign Service Officer wasn\u2019t better informed about Russian history.  <\/span>Since when is the State Department required to have a firm grasp of history?  <\/span>That principle has never applied to it in the past and I see no reason why I should conform to it now.  <\/span>Ha! <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Ben made very good points pushing back against the Russia bogey.   <\/span>His comment about Churchill and Roosevelt approving the inflow of Russian power into Eastern Europe is noteworthy.  <\/span>That fact is typically ignored when an anti-Russia speaker talks about how the Soviet bloc was really a modern replication of the Russian Empire.  <\/span>It is as though Russia was the only actor on the scene and Eastern Europe was merely putty in its hands.  <\/span>But events were shaped by other actors as well, especially the Anglo-Americans who agreed to Russia\u2019s westward advance (although they may not have liked it), as well as local Communist parties which looked to Moscow for support. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The other kind of comments were about the realist\/idealist schools of foreign policy, with Russia playing Aristotle to America\u2019s Plato.  <\/span>Elliott picked up on it and you seconded.  <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
Oz linked to a NYT article on why the most prominent anti-war voices seem to be on the right.  <\/span>That may be so, but I think the real story is the bipartisan consensus for fighting undeclared war against Russia.  <\/span>Fair to say that US assistance to the Ukrainian army has killed more Russian soldiers than the Ukrainian army acting alone.  <\/span>Many a \u201cconservative\u201d voice can be heard on the U.S. war wagon.  <\/span>I\u2019m sure you know the story about Lindsey Graham who approvingly told Zelensky recently that \u201cRussians are dying\u201d and that US support for Ukraine was the \u201cbest money we\u2019ve ever spent\u201d.  <\/span>Shame on him.<\/span><\/div>\n

Joe Odegaard<\/a><\/span> made a good point about Russia fighting to fend off the imperial reach of the West\u2019s Woke agenda.  <\/span>That story\u2019s out there in the blogosphere in various forms.  <\/span>It\u2019s a two-part story:  <\/span>there\u2019s the U.S. push for globalizing Woke, which R.R. Reno wrote about recently at First Things, and then there\u2019s the resentment against it in the patriarchal and traditional societies of the so-called \u201cGlobal South.\u201d  <\/span>I think that\u2019s one reason the Global South has not signed up to sanction Russia.  <\/span>It likes the idea of having a strong Russia and China around to curb American excesses.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

His latest on Ukraine is America's 'Revolutionary Moment.' What follows is his response to the comments made here on his earlier article Do Not Underestimate Russia's Resolve: I just read through the comments this weekend.  There certainly was a spirited debate.   The comments divide into two kinds, with Michael Brazier and Dimitri raising points about how … Continue reading “James Soriano at The American Thinker<\/i>“<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-foreign-policy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}