{"id":12848,"date":"2009-01-19T11:41:12","date_gmt":"2009-01-19T11:41:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/01\/19\/in-all-fairness-to-ayn-rand-and-the-randians\/"},"modified":"2009-01-19T11:41:12","modified_gmt":"2009-01-19T11:41:12","slug":"in-all-fairness-to-ayn-rand-and-the-randians","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/01\/19\/in-all-fairness-to-ayn-rand-and-the-randians\/","title":{"rendered":"In All Fairness to Ayn Rand and the Randians . . ."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>. . . I should point out that there are professional philosophers who take Rand&#39;s work seriously.&#0160; See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aynrandsociety.org\/\">The Ayn Rand Society.<\/a>&#0160; Some years ago I read something by Douglas Rasmussen, one of the members of the society, and I found it quite good.&#0160; <\/p>\n<p>I suppose one could compare Rand with Nietzsche on the score of professional respectability.&#0160; There are philosophers who have utter contempt for Nietzsche and deny that he is a philosopher&#0160;at all.&#0160; &#0160;In the early &#39;90s I had a conversation with the late Gregory Fitch, then chairman of the Arizona State University Philosophy Department.&#0160; I asked him if anyone in his department had an interest in Nietzsche.&#0160; He&#0160;snorted that&#0160;that no one there was interested in &quot;that junk.&quot;&#0160;&#0160; But not all analytic philosophers are narrow Fitch-style bigots.&#0160; There are other analytic philosophers who find Nietzsche&#39;s ideas worthy of study and reconstruction.&#0160; <\/p>\n<p>Like Nietzsche, Rand is untrained in philosophy, rants and raves, argues in an abominably slovenly fashion when she argues at all, is supremely confident&#0160; of her own towering significance, is&#0160;muddled and &#0160;idiosyncratic &#8212; Existence exists! &#8212; , expresses contempt&#0160;for her opponents, all the while psychologizing them and making little attempt to understand their actual positions.&#0160; And like Nietzsche, she is immensely attractive to adolescents of all ages.&#0160; Still, there are ideas there worth discussing, if only to show how one can go wrong.&#0160; Same with Nietzsche: he goes wrong in very interesting ways.<\/p>\n<p>Recall what got me started on this current Rand jag.&#0160; It was &#39;Ocham&#39;s&#39; <a href=\"http:\/\/ocham.blogspot.com\/2009\/01\/ayn-rand-and-wikipedia.html\">question<\/a> whether Rand counts as a professional or an amateur.&#0160; I have been making a case that she and Peikoff are amateurs.&#0160; (This is consistent with their ideas being worth discussing.) But it is no surprise to me that amateurs fail to appreciate the merits of my case.&#0160; More to come.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>. . . I should point out that there are professional philosophers who take Rand&#39;s work seriously.&#0160; See The Ayn Rand Society.&#0160; Some years ago I read something by Douglas Rasmussen, one of the members of the society, and I found it quite good.&#0160; I suppose one could compare Rand with Nietzsche on the score &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/01\/19\/in-all-fairness-to-ayn-rand-and-the-randians\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;In All Fairness to Ayn Rand and the Randians . . .&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[175],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12848","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rand-ayn"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12848","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12848"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12848\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}