{"id":12820,"date":"2009-02-11T15:43:16","date_gmt":"2009-02-11T15:43:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/02\/11\/why-do-i-delete-comments\/"},"modified":"2009-02-11T15:43:16","modified_gmt":"2009-02-11T15:43:16","slug":"why-do-i-delete-comments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/02\/11\/why-do-i-delete-comments\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Do I Delete Comments?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Why do I delete comments? It is not because the commenter disagrees with what I say.&#0160; In <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2009\/02\/epistemicdoxastic-possibility.html\">Epistemic\/Doxastic Possibility<\/a> I floated a definition that commenter Andrew Bailey refuted. He blew it clean out of the water.&#0160; I acknowledged the refutation as soon as I became aware of it and proposed a different definition.&#0160; Bailey refuted that one too. The discussion proceeded from there with what I hope was mutual benefit.&#0160; Bailey&#39;s was an example of a good comment.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>So you don&#39;t have to agree with me.&#0160; But you must address what I say and demonstrate that you understand the issues and are competent to discuss them.&#0160; You must show that you have a philosophical spirit and are not an ideologue.&#0160; Those are the rules.&#0160; If you don&#39;t like them you are free to go elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>On my previous weblog, a potential commenter had to apply before being let in.&#0160; This allowed me to vet applicants for their likelihood to contribute usefully.&#0160; On this version of <em>Maverick Philosopher<\/em> I am experimenting with a different method.&#0160; On some but not all posts the ComBox is wide open.&#0160; This makes it very easy to leave a comment.&#0160; But your first comment is your application and letter of introduction.<\/p>\n<p>In the New Testament we read, &quot;Judge not lest ye be judged.&quot; (Lk 6:37) But I say unto you, &quot;Judge and be prepared to be judged.&quot;&#0160; Readers of Ayn Rand know that that is a formulation of hers.&#0160; So they are not in much of a position to complain if it is applied to them.&#0160; Hostility, stupidity, ignorance, unseriousness and incivility are all disqualifiers.&#0160; And so are being a sophist or an ideologue.<\/p>\n<p>Ideologues especially are not welcome.&#0160; You must love truth above your pet convictions.&#0160; You must be able to accept criticism and refutation.<\/p>\n<p>Leaving comments is a privilege, not a right. The site administrator is under no obligation to accept comments at all, let alone from any particular person. This site is private property.&#0160; I allow you to be here.&#0160; If a man&#39;s home is his castle, his blog is his cybercastle.&#0160; Would you allow just anyone into your &#39;castle&#39;?&#0160; If you invite someone in and he behaves offensively or stupidly would you invite&#0160;him back?&#0160; Probably not; so why should I?&#0160;<\/p>\n<p>Disallowing comments from a particular person, or deleting an offensive, off-topic, or otherwise substandard comment, has nothing to do with censorship. People who think otherwise confuse censorship with lack of sponsorship. I am under no obligation to provide anyone with a forum.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Why do I delete comments? It is not because the commenter disagrees with what I say.&#0160; In Epistemic\/Doxastic Possibility I floated a definition that commenter Andrew Bailey refuted. He blew it clean out of the water.&#0160; I acknowledged the refutation as soon as I became aware of it and proposed a different definition.&#0160; Bailey refuted &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/02\/11\/why-do-i-delete-comments\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Why Do I Delete Comments?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[109],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}