{"id":12746,"date":"2009-03-16T16:42:51","date_gmt":"2009-03-16T16:42:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/03\/16\/hypocrisy-2\/"},"modified":"2009-03-16T16:42:51","modified_gmt":"2009-03-16T16:42:51","slug":"hypocrisy-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/03\/16\/hypocrisy-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Hypocrisy"},"content":{"rendered":"

People like to accuse each other of hypocrisy, but I find that few bother to ask themselves what they mean by the word. The main point that needs to be made is that a hypocrite cannot be defined as a person who espouses high moral standards but fails to live up to them. For on that definition, all who espouse high moral standards would be hypocrites. Since to fall short is human, defining a hypocrite as one who fails to live up to the high standards he espouses implies that the only way to avoid hypocrisy is to renounce high moral standards, a course of action seemingly pursued by many nowadays. No one can call you a hypocrite if you have no standards, or standards that are easily satisfied.<\/font><\/p>\n

No, a hypocrite is not one who espouses high standards and falls short of them: your humble correspondent espouses high standards, falls short of them on a daily basis, but is no hypocrite. A hypocrite is one who espouses high moral standards, but makes little or no attempt to live in accordance with them. He is one who pays \u2018lip service\u2019 to high ideals, by \u2018talking the talk,\u2019 but without \u2018walking the walk.\u2019 Someone who talks the talk, walks the walk, but stumbles a lot cannot be justly accused of hypocrisy. That\u2019s my main point.<\/font><\/p>\n

A second point is that there is something worse that hypocrisy, namely, having no choice-worthy ideals. One who pays \u2018lip service\u2019 to ideals is at least recognizing their legitimacy, their oughtness-to-be-realized. Such a person is morally superior to the one who avoids the accusation of hypocrisy by having no ideals.<\/font><\/p>\n

Notice, I said 'choice-worthy ideals.'  Better to have no ideals than the wrong ones.  It is a mistake to think that it is good to be idealistic sans phrase.<\/em> <\/font><\/p>\n

Perhaps we need four categories. Saints<\/strong> espouse high and choice-worthy ideals and never fail to live in accordance with them. Strivers<\/strong> espouse high and choice-worthy ideals, make an honest effort to live up to them, but are subject to lapses. Hypocrites<\/strong> espouse high and choice-worthy ideals, but make little or no attempt to live up to them. Scamps<\/strong>, being bereft of moral sense, do not even recognize high and choice-worthy ideals, let alone make an effort to live up to them.  <\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

People like to accuse each other of hypocrisy, but I find that few bother to ask themselves what they mean by the word. The main point that needs to be made is that a hypocrite cannot be defined as a person who espouses high moral standards but fails to live up to them. For on … Continue reading “Hypocrisy”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[241,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hypocrisy","category-virtues-and-vices"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}