{"id":12622,"date":"2009-05-21T19:33:22","date_gmt":"2009-05-21T19:33:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/05\/21\/if-you-are-a-conservative-dont-talk-like-a-liberal-2\/"},"modified":"2009-05-21T19:33:22","modified_gmt":"2009-05-21T19:33:22","slug":"if-you-are-a-conservative-dont-talk-like-a-liberal-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/05\/21\/if-you-are-a-conservative-dont-talk-like-a-liberal-2\/","title":{"rendered":"If You are a Conservative, Don&#8217;t Talk Like a Liberal!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\" class=\"firstinpost\"><font face=\"Georgia\">I saw <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mastalk.com\/mastalk\/front.jspx;jsessionid=AB1CD7ADCC2CF68B6FB4D24E684815FB?flash=truetrue\"><font color=\"#810081\" face=\"Georgia\">Michael Smerconish<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\"> on C-Span&#0160;one morning. His conservative credentials are impressive, but he used the word &#39;homophobe.&#39;<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"firstinpost\"><font face=\"Georgia\">I&#39;ve made this point before but it bears repeating. We conservatives should never acquiesce in the Left&#39;s acts of linguistic vandalism. Battles in the culture war are often lost and won on linguistic ground. So we ought to resolutely oppose the Left&#39;s attempts at linguistic corruption.<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"firstinpost\">\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"hidden\" style=\"DISPLAY: block\"><font face=\"Georgia\">A phobia is a fear, but not every fear is a phobia. A phobia is an <em>irrational<\/em> fear. One who argues against the morality of homosexual practices, or gives reasons for opposing &#39;gay&#39; marriage is precisely &#8212; presenting arguments, and not expressing any phobia. The arguments may or may not be cogent. But they are expressive of reason, and are intended to appeal to the reason of one&#39;s interlocutor. To dismiss them as an expression of a phobia shows a lack of respect for reason and for the persons who proffer the arguments.<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"hidden\" style=\"DISPLAY: block\"><font face=\"Georgia\">There are former meat-eaters who can make an impressive case against the eating of meat. Suppose that, instead of addressing their arguments, one denounces them as &#39;carniphobes.&#39; Can you see what is wrong with that? These people have a reasoned position. Their reasoning may be more or less cogent, their premises more or less disputable. But the one thing they are not doing is expressing an irrational fear of eating meat. Many of them like the stuff and dead meat inspires no fear in them whatsoever.<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"hidden\" style=\"DISPLAY: block\"><font face=\"Georgia\">The point should be obvious: &#39;homophobia&#39; is just as objectionable as &#39;carniphobia.&#39; People who use words like these are attempting to close off debate, to bury a legitimate issue beneath a crapload of PeeCee jargon.<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"hidden\" style=\"DISPLAY: block\"><font face=\"Georgia\">So it is not just that &#39;homophobe&#39; and &#39;homophobia&#39; are question-begging epithets; they are question-<em>burying<\/em> epithets.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I saw Michael Smerconish on C-Span&#0160;one morning. His conservative credentials are impressive, but he used the word &#39;homophobe.&#39; I&#39;ve made this point before but it bears repeating. We conservatives should never acquiesce in the Left&#39;s acts of linguistic vandalism. Battles in the culture war are often lost and won on linguistic ground. So we ought &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/05\/21\/if-you-are-a-conservative-dont-talk-like-a-liberal-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;If You are a Conservative, Don&#8217;t Talk Like a Liberal!&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}