{"id":12611,"date":"2009-05-28T19:33:07","date_gmt":"2009-05-28T19:33:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/05\/28\/call-it-what-it-is\/"},"modified":"2009-05-28T19:33:07","modified_gmt":"2009-05-28T19:33:07","slug":"call-it-what-it-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/05\/28\/call-it-what-it-is\/","title":{"rendered":"Call it What it Is!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">In the swimming pool the other morning, conversation drifted onto the topic of recipes.&#0160; One lady who hails from Texas proceeded to give&#0160;me her recipe for what she referred to as cornbread &#39;dressing.&#39;&#0160; In my preferred patois, &#39;stuffing&#39; is the word, not &#39;dressing.&#39;&#0160; And so in our little conversation I kept using the &#39;s&#39; word.&#0160; In mock irritation she finally replied, &quot;It&#39;s dressing; <em>call it what it is<\/em>.&quot;&#0160; She was not really irritated, but she was serious that <em>things should be called what they are.<\/em><\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Thereon hinges a philosophical point, one which of course I did not pursue with the matron.&#0160; The point is that people often succumb to what Rudolf Carnap at the beginning of Chapter 12 of <em>An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science<\/em> calls &quot;a magical view of language&quot;:<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote dir=\"ltr\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Many people hold a magical view of language, the view that there is a mysterious natural connection of some sort between certain words (only, of course, the words with which they are familiar!) and their meanings.&#0160; The truth is that it is only by historical accident, in the evolution of our culture, that the word &#39;blue&#39; has come to mean a certain color. (116)<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">As between &#39;stuffing&#39; and &#39;dressing&#39; there is nothing to choose; neither captures the nature of their common referent.&#0160; The incantation of neither has the power to conjure up the edible reality.&#0160; Both words stand in a merely conventional relation to their common referent.<\/font><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">The confusion of words and things is a mistake to avoid.&#0160; A cognate mistake is the notion that there are such things as true definitions.&#0160; Definitions merely register our&#0160;free decisions&#0160;as to how words will be used.&#0160; Questions of true and false arise only after we have fixed our terms. <\/font><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">So is religious language based on elementary confusion? &quot;Our Father Who art in heaven, hallowed be thy Name.&quot; &quot;Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.&quot; &quot;And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us.&quot; Or is the Carnap point superficial like so much in Carnap?<\/font><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font>&#0160;<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font>&#0160;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the swimming pool the other morning, conversation drifted onto the topic of recipes.&#0160; One lady who hails from Texas proceeded to give&#0160;me her recipe for what she referred to as cornbread &#39;dressing.&#39;&#0160; In my preferred patois, &#39;stuffing&#39; is the word, not &#39;dressing.&#39;&#0160; And so in our little conversation I kept using the &#39;s&#39; word.&#0160; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/05\/28\/call-it-what-it-is\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Call it What it Is!&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}