{"id":12514,"date":"2009-07-28T12:38:56","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T12:38:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/07\/28\/a-right-to-health-care-2\/"},"modified":"2009-07-28T12:38:56","modified_gmt":"2009-07-28T12:38:56","slug":"a-right-to-health-care-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/07\/28\/a-right-to-health-care-2\/","title":{"rendered":"A Right to Health Care?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Food, shelter, and clothing are more important than health care in that one can get along for substantial periods of time without health care services but one cannot survive for long without food, shelter, and clothing. Given this plain fact, why don\u2019t the proponents of \u2018free\u2019 universal health care demand \u2018free\u2019 food, shelter, and clothing? In other words, if a citizen, just in virtue of being a citizen, has a right to health care, why doesn\u2019t the same citizen have the right to what is more fundamental, namely, food, shelter, and clothing?<\/font><\/p>\n

Why isn't health care a commodity in the way that automotive care is? If I want my car to run well, I must service it periodically. I can either do this myself or hire someone to do it for me. But surely I have no right to the free services of an auto mechanic. Of course, once I contract with a mechanic to do a specified job for a specified sum of money, then I have a right to his services and to his services being performed correctly. But that right is contingent upon our contract. You could call it a contractually acquired right. But I have no right to free automotive services just in virtue of the fact that I own a car. So why is it any different with my body? Do I have a right to a colonoscopy just in virtue of my possession of a gastrointestinal tract?<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

If you insist that people do have a right<\/em> to medical and dental services, then you owe us an explanation of why they do not also have a right to a vast array of other things that they 'need' such as cars and cell phones.<\/font><\/p>\n

My view is that health care is a commodity<\/em>. You either provide it for yourself or you hire someone to provide it for you. In the latter case, you must pay for it. It is no different in principle from housing. Just as there is a 'housing market' there is a 'health care market.' If there were a right to health care, then there would also be a right to housing. But there is no right to housing. Therefore, there is no right to health care.  Do Obama and his ilk have a reasoned response to this argument?  <\/font><\/p>\n

Rights and duties are correlative. My right to X generates in others the duty to either provide me with X or not interfere with my possession or exercise of X. Thus my right to life induces in others the duty or obligation to refrain from injuring or killing me. So if I have a right to health care, then others have the duty<\/em> to provide me with it. Think about that.  But who are those others? The government? The government has no money of its own; its revenue comes from taxing the productive members of society. But why are these productive citizens under any obligation to provide 'free' services to anyone?  Taxation is by its very nature coercive.  How does one justify morally the taking by force of money from one person to give it to another? There is also the practical question of whether the productive will allow themselves to be fleeced.<\/font><\/p>\n

If we meet in the desert and you are out of water and food, I will give you some of mine, ceteris paribus<\/em>. But I am under no moral obligation to help you; you have no right<\/em> to my supplies. My helping you will be supererogatory and reflective of my being an especially nice guy.  Similarly, you have no right to insurance or medicine or a pap smear or a sigmoidoscopy, and I have no obligation to contribute via taxation so that you may get these things.<\/font><\/p>\n

A government big enough and powerful enough to provide one with \u2018free\u2019 health care will be in an excellent position to demand \u2018appropriate\u2019 behavior from its citizens \u2013 and to enforce its demand. Suppose you enjoy risky sports such as motorcycling, hang gliding, mountain climbing and the like. Or perhaps you just like to drink or smoke or eat red meat. A government that pays for the treatment of your injuries and ailments can easily decide, on economic grounds alone, to forbid such activites under the bogus justification, \u2018for your own good.\u2019 <\/font><\/p>\n

But even if the government does not outlaw motorcycling, say, they can put a severe dent in your liberty to enjoy such a sport, say, by demanding that a 30% sales tax be slapped on all motorcycle purchases, or by outlawing bikes whose engines exceed a certain displacement, say 180 cc.  In the same way that governments levy arbitrary taxes on tobacco products, they can do the same for anything they deem risky or unhealthy.<\/font><\/p>\n

The situation is analogous to living with one\u2019s parents. It is entirely appropriate for parents to say to a child: \u2018As long as you live under our roof, eat at our table, and we pay the bills, then you must abide by our rules. When you are on your own, you may do as you please.\u2019 The difference, of course, is that it is relatively easy to move out on one\u2019s own, but difficult to forsake one\u2019s homeland.  Or is Obama yomama?<\/font><\/p>\n

The nub of the issue is liberty. Do you value it or not?<\/font><\/p>\n

Then there are the practical considerations. Nationalized health care in the UK and Canada doesn't seem to work very well. See <\/font>here<\/font><\/a>. Apparently some Brits pull their own teeth with such advanced dental appliances as pliers and vodka. That was the way dentistry was done in the days of Doc Holliday who was, as you know, a dentist besides being a damned good shot.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Food, shelter, and clothing are more important than health care in that one can get along for substantial periods of time without health care services but one cannot survive for long without food, shelter, and clothing. Given this plain fact, why don\u2019t the proponents of \u2018free\u2019 universal health care demand \u2018free\u2019 food, shelter, and clothing? … Continue reading “A Right to Health Care?”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,163,56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-affairs","category-leftism-and-political-correctness","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12514\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}