{"id":12503,"date":"2009-08-01T11:37:11","date_gmt":"2009-08-01T11:37:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/08\/01\/baby-talk-and-first-grade-english\/"},"modified":"2009-08-01T11:37:11","modified_gmt":"2009-08-01T11:37:11","slug":"baby-talk-and-first-grade-english","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/08\/01\/baby-talk-and-first-grade-english\/","title":{"rendered":"Baby Talk and First Grade English"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\" class=\"post\"><font face=\"Georgia\">It is annoying when a senator says that such-and-such is a &#39;no-no.&#39; Closely related is the phenomenon of what might be called &#39;first grade English.&#39; George Bush&#0160;and others have spoken of&#0160; &#39;growing the economy.&#39; One grows tomatoes, not economies. But perhaps I am being peevish and pedantic.<\/p>\n<p>What about the current overuse of &#39;broken&#39;? One hears that the Social Security admininstration and the Immigration and Nauralization Service are &#39;broken.&#39; One breaks things like guitar strings, bicycle chains, and glasses. That which is broken no longer functions as it was intended to. A broken X is not a suboptimally functioning X but a nonfunctioning X. Clearly, neither the SSA nor the INS are &#39;broken&#39; strictly speaking. They just don&#39;t function very well and are in dire need of reform.<\/p>\n<p>So why call them &#39;broken&#39;? Is your vocabulary so impoverished that no better word comes to mind?<\/font><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"post\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font>&#0160;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"post\"><font face=\"Georgia\">&quot;President Obama has said plainly that America&#39;s health care system is broken.&quot; That from Peter Singer in &quot;Why We Must Ration Health Care&quot; (<em>NYT Magazine<\/em>, July 19, 2009, p. 40.)&#0160; I guess that is why Canadians and others come to the USA for medical treatment they cannot get under a socialized system.<\/p>\n<p>Why are people such linguistic lemmings? If some clown uses &#39;broken&#39; inappropriately, why ape him? One has to be quite a lemming to ape a clown. (How&#39;s that for a triple mixed metaphor?) In a cognate rant, <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.powerblogs.com\/posts\/1124926960.shtml\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Issues and Problems<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">, I take issue with &#39;issue&#39; and its over- and misuse. I have a real &#39;issue&#39; with that.&#0160;&#0160; A longer piece, <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.powerblogs.com\/posts\/1172075898.shtml\"><font face=\"Georgia\">English for Boneheads: Some Torts on the Mother Tongue<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">, may also be of interest or at least get your blood up.<\/font><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"post\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font>&#0160;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"post\"><font face=\"Georgia\">People who employ baby talk and first grade English in contexts that demand careful thought demonstrate their thoughtlessness and unseriousness.&#0160; Precision in the use of language may not be sufficient for clear and productive thinking, but it is necessary.&#0160; Language matters.<\/font><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"post\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font>&#0160;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is annoying when a senator says that such-and-such is a &#39;no-no.&#39; Closely related is the phenomenon of what might be called &#39;first grade English.&#39; George Bush&#0160;and others have spoken of&#0160; &#39;growing the economy.&#39; One grows tomatoes, not economies. But perhaps I am being peevish and pedantic. What about the current overuse of &#39;broken&#39;? One &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/08\/01\/baby-talk-and-first-grade-english\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Baby Talk and First Grade English&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12503\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}