{"id":12427,"date":"2009-09-02T11:37:20","date_gmt":"2009-09-02T11:37:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/09\/02\/a-bad-reason-for-not-imposing-ones-values-on-others\/"},"modified":"2009-09-02T11:37:20","modified_gmt":"2009-09-02T11:37:20","slug":"a-bad-reason-for-not-imposing-ones-values-on-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/09\/02\/a-bad-reason-for-not-imposing-ones-values-on-others\/","title":{"rendered":"A Bad Reason for Not Imposing One&#8217;s Values on Others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\" class=\"firstinpost\"><font face=\"Georgia\">The following argument is sometimes heard. &quot;Because values are relative, it is wrong to impose one&#39;s values on others.&quot; <\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">But if values are relative, and among my values is the value of instructing others in the right way to live, then surely I am justified in imposing my values on others. What better justification could I have? If values are relative, then there is simply no objective basis for a critique or rejection of the values I happen to hold.&#0160; For it to be wrong for me to impose my values, value-imposition would have to be a nonrelative disvalue. But this is precisely what is ruled out by the premise &#39;values are relative.&#39;<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Either values are relative or they are not.&#0160; If they are relative then no one can be faulted for living in accordance with his values even if among his values is the value of&#0160; imposing one&#39;s values on others.&#0160; If, on the other hand, values are not relative, then one will be in a position&#0160;to condemn some forms of value-imposition.&#0160; The second alternative, however, is not available to one who affirms the relativity of all values.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Persons who give the above argument are trying to have it both ways at once, and in so doing fall into self-contradiction.&#0160; They want the supposed benefits of believing that values are relative &#8212; such benefits as toleration &#8212; while at the same time committing themselves to the contradictory proposition that some values are not relative by their condemnation of value-imposition.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">One sees from this how difficult it is for relativists to be consistent. A consistent relativist cannot make any such pronouncement as that it is wrong to impose one&#39;s values on others; all he can say is that <em>from within his value-scheme<\/em> it is wrong to impose one&#39;s values on others. But then he allows the possibility that there others for whom value-imposition is the right thing to do.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following argument is sometimes heard. &quot;Because values are relative, it is wrong to impose one&#39;s values on others.&quot; But if values are relative, and among my values is the value of instructing others in the right way to live, then surely I am justified in imposing my values on others. What better justification could &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/09\/02\/a-bad-reason-for-not-imposing-ones-values-on-others\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;A Bad Reason for Not Imposing One&#8217;s Values on Others&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[396,361],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-axiology","category-relativism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}