{"id":12136,"date":"2009-11-25T15:18:52","date_gmt":"2009-11-25T15:18:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/11\/25\/the-tendency-to-exaggerate\/"},"modified":"2009-11-25T15:18:52","modified_gmt":"2009-11-25T15:18:52","slug":"the-tendency-to-exaggerate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/11\/25\/the-tendency-to-exaggerate\/","title":{"rendered":"The Tendency to Exaggerate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"justify\" class=\"firstinpost\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Not content to say what is true, people exaggerate thereby turning the true into the false. Three examples from sober philosophers.<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"firstinpost\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Martin Buber, who is certainly no Frenchman, writes that \u201ca melody is not composed of tones, nor a verse of words&#8230;\u201d (<strong>I and Thou<\/strong>, p. 59) His point is that a melody cannot be reduced to its individual notes, nor a verse to its constituent words. But he expresses this truth in a way that makes it absurdly false. A melody without tones would be no melody at all. The <em>litterateur<\/em> exaggerates for literary effect, but Buber is no mere <em>litterateur<\/em>. So what is going on?<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"hidden\" style=\"DISPLAY: block\"><font face=\"Georgia\">For a second example, consider Martin Heidegger. Somewhere in <strong>Sein und Zeit<\/strong> he writes that <em>Das Dasein ist nie vorhanden<\/em>. The human being is never present-at-hand. This is obviously false in that the human being has a body which is present-at-hand in nature as surely as any animal or stone. What he is driving at is the truth &#8212; or at least the plausibility &#8212; that the human being enjoys a special mode of Being, <em>Existenz<\/em>, that is radically unlike the <em>Vorhandenheit<\/em> of the mere thing in nature and the <em>Zuhandenheit<\/em> of the tool. So why doesn\u2019t he speak the truth, and nothing but the truth, without exaggerating?<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"hidden\" style=\"DISPLAY: block\"><font face=\"Georgia\">And then there is Ludwig Wittgenstein, who, according to J. N. Findlay, \u201ctook every wrong turn a philosopher can take.\u201d (Personal communication) Wittgenstein\u2019s fideism involves such absurd exaggerations as that religions imply no theoretical views. But when a Christian, reciting the Nicene creed, says \u201cI believe in God the Father, almighty creator of heaven and earth&#8230;\u201d he commits himself thereby to the metaphysical view that heaven and earth have a certain ontological status, namely, that of being creatures. <\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"hidden\" style=\"DISPLAY: block\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Of course, the Christian is doing more than this: his \u2018I believe\u2019 expresses trust in God as a person and not mere belief that certain propositions are true. But to deny that there is any propositional content to his belief would be ludicrous. And yet that appears to be what Wittgenstein is doing.<\/font><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not content to say what is true, people exaggerate thereby turning the true into the false. Three examples from sober philosophers. Martin Buber, who is certainly no Frenchman, writes that \u201ca melody is not composed of tones, nor a verse of words&#8230;\u201d (I and Thou, p. 59) His point is that a melody cannot be &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2009\/11\/25\/the-tendency-to-exaggerate\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Tendency to Exaggerate&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,125],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-human-predicament","category-truthfulness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12136\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}