{"id":11937,"date":"2010-01-04T18:47:52","date_gmt":"2010-01-04T18:47:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/04\/it-is-what-it-is-3\/"},"modified":"2010-01-04T18:47:52","modified_gmt":"2010-01-04T18:47:52","slug":"it-is-what-it-is-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/04\/it-is-what-it-is-3\/","title":{"rendered":"It Is What It Is"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Maybe not. It all depends on what the meaning of &#39;is&#39; is.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Seriously, though, this saying is seeing quite a lot of use lately.&#0160; It is a sort of present-tensed <em>Que sera, sera.<\/em>&#0160; Things are the way they are.&#0160; Don&#39;t kick against the pricks.&#0160; Acceptance and resignation are the appropriate attitudes.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">From a philosophy-of-language point of view, what is interesting is the use of a tautological form of words to express a non-tautological proposition.&#0160; What the words mean is not what the speaker means in uttering the words.&#0160; Sentence meaning and speaker&#39;s meaning come apart.&#0160; The speaker does not literally mean that things are what they are &#8212; for what the hell else could they be?&#0160; Not what they are?&#0160; What the speaker means is that (certain) things can&#39;t be changed and so must be accepted with resignation.&#0160; Your dead-end job for example.&#0160; &#39;It is what it is.&#39;<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">There are many examples of the use of tautological sentences to express non-tautological propositions.&#0160; &#39;What will be, will be&#39; is an example, as is &#39;Beer is beer.&#39;&#0160; When Ayn Rand&#0160;proclaimed that Existence exists! she did not mean to assert the tautological proposition that each existing thing exists; she&#0160;was ineptly employing a tautological sentence to express&#0160;a non-tautological and not uncontroversial thesis of metaphysical realism according to which what exists exists independently of any mind, finite or infinite.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">&#39;What will be will be&#39; is tautologically true and thus necessarily true.&#0160; What the sentence is typically used to express, however, is the non-tautological, and arguably false, proposition that what will be, will necessarily be, that it cannot be otherwise.&#0160; So not only do sentence meaning and speaker&#39;s meaning come apart in this case; a modal fallacy is lurking in the background as well, the ancient fallacy of confusing the <em>necessitas consequentiae<\/em> with the <em>necessitas consequentiis<\/em>.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Now you know what I think about on those long training runs (3 hours, 18 minutes last Sunday).&#0160; Running is marvelous for &#39;jogging&#39; one&#39;s thoughts.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Maybe not. It all depends on what the meaning of &#39;is&#39; is. Seriously, though, this saying is seeing quite a lot of use lately.&#0160; It is a sort of present-tensed Que sera, sera.&#0160; Things are the way they are.&#0160; Don&#39;t kick against the pricks.&#0160; Acceptance and resignation are the appropriate attitudes. From a philosophy-of-language point &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/04\/it-is-what-it-is-3\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;It Is What It Is&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,316],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-language-matters","category-maxims-mottoes-epitaphs-etc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11937"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11937\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}