{"id":11933,"date":"2010-01-05T16:43:17","date_gmt":"2010-01-05T16:43:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/05\/kitsch-and-cliche\/"},"modified":"2010-01-05T16:43:17","modified_gmt":"2010-01-05T16:43:17","slug":"kitsch-and-cliche","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/05\/kitsch-and-cliche\/","title":{"rendered":"Kitsch and Clich\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0120a7aa0445970b-pi\" style=\"FLOAT: left\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Kinkade1\" class=\"asset asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c0120a7aa0445970b \" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0120a7aa0445970b-320wi\" style=\"MARGIN: 0px 5px 5px 0px\" \/><\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\"> <\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">To the left is an example of kitsch from that master of kitsch, Thomas Kinkade.&#0160; Is there no visual&#0160;clich\u00e9 that he will not avail himself of?&#0160; Note the wisps of smoke emanating from the chimneys.&#0160; Just as we are annoyed by those who thoughtlessly retail platitudes, we are also annoyed by the analogous thoughtlessness of those artists who serve up what the average Joe &#39;knows&#39; to be art and expects.&#0160; This, I take it, is part of what we object to in kitsch, and part of what we mean by kitsch.&#0160; (But there is a lot more to it than this, and your humble correspondent has only begun to think hard about these questions.) What is offensive in kitsch is the&#0160;thoughtless purveyance of visual clich\u00e9&#39;s, the pandering to the viewer, the &#39;pushing of his buttons,&#39; and in some cases the cynical attempt to elicit a stock emotional response in order sell the&#0160;stuff.&#0160; Wholesome schlock for the masses&#0160; mass-produced for a tidy profit.&#0160; Art for the overfed denizens of Dubuque and Fargo who, wallowing in complacency, want to be reinforced in their tastes and prejudices.&#0160; Art for the malls of&#0160; &#39;fly-over country.&#39;&#0160; None of my discerning readers, I trust, could be paid to hang such a thing in their homes.&#0160; Well, if you <em>paid<\/em> me, and I had an empty wall needing a splash of color, then I <em>might<\/em> display it&#0160;for didactic and ironic purposes.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">But clich\u00e9s, by definition, are true and meaningful, albeit flattened by overuse, and this is the other side of the coin.&#0160; Kitsch is offensive, but so is what might be called anti-kitsch, the mannered result of trying to be far-out and avant-garde. Isn&#39;t a boring truth better than an &#39;original&#39; falsehood?&#0160; Doesn&#39;t truth trump novelty in a sane scale of values?&#0160;&#0160; Isn&#39;t beauty, even of a conventional sort, better than ugliness? The febrile and adolescent attempt to to be original and avant-garde at all costs has led in the 20th century to&#0160;a crapload of art and music without human meaning.&#0160; It is at least arguable that wholesome schlock that has some human meaning is superior to decadent junk like this from the house-painting brush of Mark Rothko:<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c012876ac8163970c-pi\" style=\"FLOAT: left\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Rothko_061\" class=\"asset asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c012876ac8163970c \" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c012876ac8163970c-320wi\" style=\"MARGIN: 0px 5px 5px 0px\" \/><\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\"> <br \/><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To the left is an example of kitsch from that master of kitsch, Thomas Kinkade.&#0160; Is there no visual&#0160;clich\u00e9 that he will not avail himself of?&#0160; Note the wisps of smoke emanating from the chimneys.&#0160; Just as we are annoyed by those who thoughtlessly retail platitudes, we are also annoyed by the analogous thoughtlessness of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/05\/kitsch-and-cliche\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Kitsch and Clich\u00e9&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[412],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11933","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-art-and-aesthetics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11933","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11933"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11933\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11933"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11933"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11933"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}