{"id":11892,"date":"2010-01-25T07:53:49","date_gmt":"2010-01-25T07:53:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/25\/trinitarian-reading-material\/"},"modified":"2010-01-25T07:53:49","modified_gmt":"2010-01-25T07:53:49","slug":"trinitarian-reading-material","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/25\/trinitarian-reading-material\/","title":{"rendered":"Trinitarian Reading Material"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0120a80b0a8b970b-pi\" style=\"FLOAT: left\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Trinity\" class=\"asset asset-image at-xid-6a010535ce1cf6970c0120a80b0a8b970b \" src=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/.a\/6a010535ce1cf6970c0120a80b0a8b970b-500wi\" style=\"MARGIN: 0px 5px 5px 0px\" \/><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/filosofer.googlepages.com\/dt.html\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Dale Tuggy<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">&#39;s <em>Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy<\/em> entry, <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/trinity\/\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Trinity<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">, provides a good overview.&#0160; The specialist blog, <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/trinities.org\/blog\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Trinities<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">, to which he contributes will also be of interest.&#0160; <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/eyring.hplx.net\/Eyring\/Notes\/trinity.html\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Here<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\"> is Richard Cartwright&#39;s excellent &quot;On the Logical Problem of the Trinity.&quot;&#0160; <em>Caveat lector:<\/em> it contains a few scanning errors.&#0160;Essential reading nonetheless.&#0160; Cartwright rejects Peter Geach&#39;s relative identity solution.&#0160; For a defense of the relative identity approach, see A, P. Martinich, <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/pss\/1201874\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Identity and Trinity.<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">&#0160;(Requires access to JSTOR.&#0160; What? You say you don&#39;t have access to JSTOR?&#0160; How do you live without it?)<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Jeffrey Brouwer and Michael Rea, <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nd.edu\/~mrea\/papers\/Material%20Constitution%20and%20the%20Trinity.pdf\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Material Constitution and the Trinity.<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">&#0160; For William Lane Craig&#39;s critique, see <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/www.leaderu.com\/offices\/billcraig\/docs\/matcontrinity.html#_edn1\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Does the Problem of Material Constitution Illuminate The Doctrine of The Trinity?<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">&#0160; <\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">That barely scratches the surface, but should keep you busy for a while.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">By the way, don&#39;t confuse the diagram with the doctrine.&#0160; It is a graphic &#39;aid&#39; which probably does more harm than good.&#0160; Philosophical thinking is not picture-thinking.&#0160; As Hegel might have said, <em>Philosophisches Denken ist nicht vorstellendes, sondern begriffliches, Denken.<\/em><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dale Tuggy&#39;s Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry, Trinity, provides a good overview.&#0160; The specialist blog, Trinities, to which he contributes will also be of interest.&#0160; Here is Richard Cartwright&#39;s excellent &quot;On the Logical Problem of the Trinity.&quot;&#0160; Caveat lector: it contains a few scanning errors.&#0160;Essential reading nonetheless.&#0160; Cartwright rejects Peter Geach&#39;s relative identity solution.&#0160; For &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/01\/25\/trinitarian-reading-material\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Trinitarian Reading Material&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[288],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11892","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-trinity-and-incarnation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11892","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}