{"id":11850,"date":"2010-02-08T15:58:08","date_gmt":"2010-02-08T15:58:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/02\/08\/alvin-plantina-on-youtube-a-modal-argument-for-dualism\/"},"modified":"2010-02-08T15:58:08","modified_gmt":"2010-02-08T15:58:08","slug":"alvin-plantina-on-youtube-a-modal-argument-for-dualism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/02\/08\/alvin-plantina-on-youtube-a-modal-argument-for-dualism\/","title":{"rendered":"Alvin Plantinga on YouTube:  A Modal Argument for Dualism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=WOTn_wRwDE0\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Here.<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">&#0160; The host, Robert Kuhn, &quot;an old brain scientist&quot; as he describes himself, can&#39;t seem to wrap his mind around the argument.&#0160; The argument goes like this, where &#39;B&#39; denotes (rigidly designates) a person&#39;s body or else that part of a person&#39;s body (presumably the brain or a part of the brain) with which the materialist wishes to identify the person.<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote dir=\"ltr\">\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">1. If x = y, then whatever is true of x is true of y and vice versa. (Leibniz&#39;s Law)<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">2. &#39;Possibly exists when B doesn&#39;t&#39; is true of me but not true of B.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">3. Therefore: I am not identical to B.&#0160; (From 1, 2 by Universal Instantiation and Modus Tollens)<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Kuhn, at or around 4:26,&#0160;objects that the distinction between a person and his body is &quot;a possibility, an indeterminate fact.&quot;&#0160; No! The possibility of my existing when B doesn&#39;t entails <em>the actual difference<\/em> between me and my body, not the mere possibility of such a difference.&#0160; And&#0160;Kuhn still doesn&#39;t get it after Plantinga explains it.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">The argument is valid in point of logical form, and (1) is a principle than which a more luminous&#0160;one cannot be conceived; but what is the evidence for (2)? How does one know&#0160;that it is possible that one exist when one&#39;s body or brain doesn&#39;t?&#0160; Because one can imagine that state of affairs. Plantinga reminds us of Franz Kafka&#39;s short story, &quot;The Metamorphosis&quot; in which the protagonist, Gregor Samsa, wakes up one morning with the body of a beetle.&#0160; It is imaginable that one retain one&#39;s conscious identity while possessing a beetle body, and further imaginable that one&#39;s human body be destroyed; this, Plantinga maintains, is evidence for the truth of (2).<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">It didn&#39;t occur to Kuhn to question whether imaginability is evidence of possibility. <\/font><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here.&#0160; The host, Robert Kuhn, &quot;an old brain scientist&quot; as he describes himself, can&#39;t seem to wrap his mind around the argument.&#0160; The argument goes like this, where &#39;B&#39; denotes (rigidly designates) a person&#39;s body or else that part of a person&#39;s body (presumably the brain or a part of the brain) with which the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/02\/08\/alvin-plantina-on-youtube-a-modal-argument-for-dualism\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Alvin Plantinga on YouTube:  A Modal Argument for Dualism&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54,235],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mind","category-modal-matters"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}