{"id":11746,"date":"2010-03-24T16:30:12","date_gmt":"2010-03-24T16:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/03\/24\/the-lefts-hatred-of-conservative-talk-radio-3\/"},"modified":"2010-03-24T16:30:12","modified_gmt":"2010-03-24T16:30:12","slug":"the-lefts-hatred-of-conservative-talk-radio-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/03\/24\/the-lefts-hatred-of-conservative-talk-radio-3\/","title":{"rendered":"The Left&#8217;s Hatred of Conservative Talk Radio"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">The qualifier &#39;conservative&#39; borders on pleonasm: there is is scarcely any talk radio in the U.S. worth talking about that is <em>not<\/em> conservative.&#0160; This is part of the reason the Left hates&#0160;the conservative variety&#0160;so much.&#0160; They hate it because of its content, and they hate it because they are incapable of competing with it: their own attempts such as <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Air_America_(radio_network)\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Air America<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\"> have failed miserably. And so, projecting their own hatred,&#0160;they label&#0160;conservative talk&#0160;&#39;hate radio.&#39;<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">In a <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/03\/23\/opinion\/23herbert.html\"><font face=\"Georgia\">22 March&#0160;op-ed piece in the NYT<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">, Bob Herbert, commenting on the G.O.P., writes, &quot;This is the party that genuflects at the altar of right-wing talk radio, with its insane, nauseating, nonstop commitment to hatred and bigotry.&quot;<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">I find that vile outburst fascinating.&#0160; There is no insanity, hatred, or bigotry in any of the conservative talk jocks&#0160;whom I listen to:&#0160; Laura Ingram, Bill Bennett, Hugh Hewitt, Mike Gallagher, Dennis Prager or Michael Medved.&#0160; There is instead common sense, humanity, excellent advice, warnings against extremism, deep life wisdom, facts, arguments, and a reasonably high level of discourse.&#0160; Of the six I have mentioned, Prager and Medved are the best, a fact reflected in their large audiences.&#0160; See for yourself!<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">So what is it about Herbert and people&#0160; of his ilk that causes them to react routinely in such delusional fashion?<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">It is a long story, of course, but part of it is &#0160;that lefties confuse dissent with hate.&#0160; They don&#39;t seem to realize that if I dissent from your view, it doesn&#39;t follow that I hate you.&#0160; This&#0160;confusion goes hand in hand with the strange notion that the Left owns dissent, which I duly refute in a <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2009\/08\/does-the-left-own-dissent.html\"><font face=\"Georgia\">substantial post<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">I leave you with a quotation from David Horowitz, <strong>Left Illusions: An Intellectual Odyssey<\/strong> (Spence, 2003), p. 273, emphasis added:<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"post\">\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">The image of the right that the left has concocted &#8212; authoritarian, reactionary, bigoted, mean-spirited &#8212; is an absurd caricature that has no relation to modern conservatism or to the reality of the people I have come to know in my decade-long movement along the political spectrum &#8212; or to the way I see myself. Except for a lunatic fringe, American conservatism is not about &quot;blood and soil&quot; nostalgia or conspiracy paranoia, which figure so largely in imaginations that call themselves &quot;liberal,&quot; but are anything but. Modern American conservatism is a reform movement that seeks to reinvent free markets and limited government and to restore somewhat traditional values. <strong>Philosophically, conservatism is more accurately seen as a species of liberalism itself<\/strong> &#8212; and would be more often described in this way were it not for the hegemony the left exerts in the political culture and its appropriation of the term &quot;liberal&quot; to obscure its radical agenda.<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">One more thing.&#0160; You can see from Herbert&#39;s picture that he is black. So now I will be called a racist for exposing his outburst.&#0160; That is right out of the Left&#39;s playbook:&#0160; if a conservative disagrees with you on any issue, or proffers any sort of criticism, then you heap&#0160;abuse on him.&#0160; He&#39;s a racist, a sexist, a xenophobe, a &#39;homophobe,&#39; a bigot, a religious zealot . . . .<br \/><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The qualifier &#39;conservative&#39; borders on pleonasm: there is is scarcely any talk radio in the U.S. worth talking about that is not conservative.&#0160; This is part of the reason the Left hates&#0160;the conservative variety&#0160;so much.&#0160; They hate it because of its content, and they hate it because they are incapable of competing with it: their &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/03\/24\/the-lefts-hatred-of-conservative-talk-radio-3\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Left&#8217;s Hatred of Conservative Talk Radio&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[163],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-leftism-and-political-correctness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}