{"id":11416,"date":"2010-08-05T13:30:40","date_gmt":"2010-08-05T13:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/08\/05\/paradoxes-of-illegal-immigration-3\/"},"modified":"2010-08-05T13:30:40","modified_gmt":"2010-08-05T13:30:40","slug":"paradoxes-of-illegal-immigration-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/08\/05\/paradoxes-of-illegal-immigration-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Paradoxes of Illegal Immigration"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Philosophers hate a contradiction, but love a paradox.&#0160; There are paradoxes everywhere, in the precincts of the most abstruse as well as in the precincts of the prosaic.&#0160; Here are&#0160;eight paradoxes of illegal immigration suggested to me by <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/articles\/2010\/08\/05\/illogical_immigration_106623.html\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Victor Davis Hanson.<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; The titles and formulations are my own.&#0160; For good measure, I add a ninth, of my own invention.&#0160; <\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of Profiling.<\/strong>&#0160; Racial profiling is supposed to&#0160;&#0160; be <em>verboten.<\/em>&#0160; And yet it is employed by American border guards when they nab and deport thousands of illegal border crossers.&#0160; Otherwise, how could they pick out illegals from citizens who are merely in the vicinity of the border?&#0160; How can what is permissible near the border be impermissible far from it in, say, Phoenix?&#0160; At&#0160;what distance&#0160; does permissibility transmogrify into impermissibility?&#0160; If a border patrolman&#0160;may profile why may not a highway patrolman? Is legal permissibility within a state indexed to spatiotemporal position and variable with variations in the latter?<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of Encroachment.<\/strong>&#0160; The Federal government sues the state of Arizona for upholding Federal immigration law on the ground that it is an encroachment upon Federal jurisdiction.&#0160; But sanctuary cities flout Federal law by not allowing the enforcement of Federal immigration statutes.&#0160; Clearly, impeding the enforcement of Federal laws is far worse than duplicating and perhaps interfering with Federal law enforcement efforts.&#0160; And yet the Feds go after Arizona while ignoring sanctuary cities.&#0160; Paradoxical, eh?<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of Blaming the Benefactor.<\/strong>&#0160; Millions flee Mexico for the U.S. because of the desirability of living and working here and the undesirability of living in a crime-ridden, corrupt, and impoverished country.&#0160; So what does Mexican president Felipe Calderon do?&#0160; Why, he criticizes the U.S.&#0160;even though the U.S. &#0160;provides to his citizens what he and his government cannot! And what do many Mexicans do?&#0160; They wave the Mexican flag in a country whose laws they violate and from whose toleration they benefit. <\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of Differential Sovereignty and Variable Border Violability.<\/strong>&#0160; Apparently, some states are more sovereign than others.&#0160; The U.S., for some reason, is less sovereign than &#0160;Mexico, which is highly intolerant of invaders from Central America.&#0160; Paradoxically, the violability of a border is a function of the countries between which the border falls.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of <em>Los Locos Gringos<\/em>.<\/strong>&#0160; The gringos are crazy, and racist xenophobes to boot, inasmuch as 70% of them demand border security and support AZ SB 1070.&#0160; Why then do so many Mexicans want to live among the crazy gringos?&#0160; <\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of Supporting While Stiffing the Working Stiff.<\/strong>&#0160; Liberals have traditionally been for the working man.&#0160; But by being soft on illegal immigration they help drive down the hourly wages of the working poor north of the Rio Grande.&#0160; (As I have said in other posts, there are liberal arguments against illegal immigration, and here are the makings of one.)<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of Penalizing the Legal while Tolerating the Illegal.<\/strong>&#0160;&#0160; Legal immigrants face hurdles and long waits while illegals are tolerated.&#0160; But liberals are supposed to be big on fairness.&#0160; How fair is this?<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of Subsidizing a Country Whose Citizens Violate our Laws.<\/strong>&#0160; &quot;America extends housing, food and education subsidies to illegal aliens in need. But Mexico receives more than $20 billion in American remittances a year &#8212; its second-highest source of foreign exchange, and almost all of it from its own nationals living in the United States.&quot;&#0160; So the U.S. takes care of illegal aliens from a failed state while subsidizing that state, making it more dependent, and less likely to clean up its act.&#0160; <\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><strong>The Paradox of the Reconquista.<\/strong>&#0160; Some Hispanics claim that the Southwest and California were &#39;stolen&#39; from Mexico by the gringos.&#0160; Well, suppose that this vast chunk of real estate had not been &#39;stolen&#39; and now belonged to Mexico.&#0160; Then it would be as screwed up as the rest of Mexico: as economically indigent, as politically corrupt, as crime-ridden, as drug-infested.&#0160; Illegal immigrants from southern Mexico would then, in that counterfactual scenario, &#0160;have farther to travel to get to the U.S., and there would be less of the U.S. for their use and enjoyment.&#0160; The U.S. would be able to take in fewer of them.&#0160; They would be worse off.&#0160; So if Mexico were to re-conquer the lands &#39;stolen&#39; from it, then it would make itself worse off than it is now.&#0160; Gaining territory it would lose ground &#8212; if I may put paradoxically the Paradox of the Reconquista.<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Exercise for the reader:&#0160; Find more paradoxes!<\/font><\/p>\n<p style=\"TEXT-ALIGN: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\"><\/font>&#0160;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Philosophers hate a contradiction, but love a paradox.&#0160; There are paradoxes everywhere, in the precincts of the most abstruse as well as in the precincts of the prosaic.&#0160; Here are&#0160;eight paradoxes of illegal immigration suggested to me by Victor Davis Hanson.&#0160;&#0160;&#0160; The titles and formulations are my own.&#0160; For good measure, I add a ninth, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/08\/05\/paradoxes-of-illegal-immigration-3\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Paradoxes of Illegal Immigration&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[131,32,163,80],"tags":[755],"class_list":["post-11416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-arizona","category-current-affairs","category-leftism-and-political-correctness","category-paradoxes","tag-illegal-immigration-paradoxes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}