{"id":11343,"date":"2010-09-04T19:06:24","date_gmt":"2010-09-04T19:06:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/09\/04\/is-william-the-nominalist-a-mereological-nihilist\/"},"modified":"2010-09-04T19:06:24","modified_gmt":"2010-09-04T19:06:24","slug":"is-william-the-nominalist-a-mereological-nihilist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/09\/04\/is-william-the-nominalist-a-mereological-nihilist\/","title":{"rendered":"Mereological Nihilism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">I put to William the following question:&#0160; <\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote dir=\"ltr\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Are you prepared to assert the following? It is never the case that whenever there are some things, there is a whole with those things as parts. Equivalently: For any xs, if the xs are two or more, there is no y such that the xs compose y.<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">To which <\/font><a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2010\/09\/mereological-innocence-and-composition-as-identity.html?cid=6a010535ce1cf6970c0133f391c0fe970b#comment-6a010535ce1cf6970c0133f391c0fe970b\"><font face=\"Georgia\">he replied<\/font><\/a><font face=\"Georgia\">:&#0160; &quot;Agreed, if you are using xs as a plural quantifier, and by implication y as a singular quantifier.&quot;<\/font><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">I think William was too hasty in agreeing since his agreement makes him a mereological nihilist, or nihilist for short.&#0160; Nihilism&#0160; is the logical contrary, not contradictory, of mereological universalism, or universalism for short.&#0160;&#0160;Universalism is what is expressed by Unrestricted Composition:<\/font><\/p>\n<blockquote dir=\"ltr\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">UC. Whenever there are some things, then there exists a fusion [sum] of those things. (David Lewis, <em>Parts of Classes<\/em>, Basil Blackwell 1991, p. 74)<\/font><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><font face=\"Georgia\">Given Extensionality &#8212; no two wholes have the same parts &#8212; (UC) says that whenever there are some individuals, no matter what their character or category, there is a unique individual that they compose.&#0160; This is their mereological sum.&#0160; Universalism is hard to swallow.&#0160; I do not balk at the sum of the books in my house.&#0160; But I balk at the sum of : the books in my house, William&#39;s last heartbeat, Peter&#39;s left foot, and the planet Mercury.&#0160; But if, recoiling from Universalism, one embraces Nihilism, then one is committed to the proposition that there are no composite objects, there are only simples.&#0160; And surely William does not want to be committed to that.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I put to William the following question:&#0160; Are you prepared to assert the following? It is never the case that whenever there are some things, there is a whole with those things as parts. Equivalently: For any xs, if the xs are two or more, there is no y such that the xs compose y. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/09\/04\/is-william-the-nominalist-a-mereological-nihilist\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Mereological Nihilism&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[86],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-wholes-and-parts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11343\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}