{"id":11065,"date":"2010-12-11T06:35:03","date_gmt":"2010-12-11T06:35:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/12\/11\/being-dead-and-being-nonexistent-or-how-to-cease-to-exist-without-dying\/"},"modified":"2010-12-11T06:35:03","modified_gmt":"2010-12-11T06:35:03","slug":"being-dead-and-being-nonexistent-or-how-to-cease-to-exist-without-dying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/12\/11\/being-dead-and-being-nonexistent-or-how-to-cease-to-exist-without-dying\/","title":{"rendered":"Being Dead and Being Nonexistent, or:  How to Cease to Exist without Dying"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">In general, being dead and being nonexistent are not the same &#39;property&#39; for an obvious reason: only that which was once alive can properly be said to be dead, and not everything was once alive.&#0160; Nevertheless, it might be thought that, for living things, to be is to be alive, and not to be is to be dead.&#0160; But I think this Aristotelian view can be shown to be mistaken.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">1. A human person cannot become dead except by dying.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2. But a human person can become nonexistent without dying in at least&#0160;four ways.&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2a. The first way is by entering into irreversible coma.&#0160; Given that consciousness is an essential attribute of persons, a person who enters into irreversible coma ceases to exist.&#0160; But the person&#39;s body remains alive.&#0160; Therefore, a human person can cease to exist without dying.&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2b. The second way is by fission.&#0160; Suppose one human person A enters a Person Splitter and exits two physically and behaviorally and psychologically indiscernible persons, B and C.&#0160; B is not C.&#0160; So A is not B and A is not C.&#0160; What happened to A?&#0160; A ceased to exist.&#0160; But A didn&#39;t die.&#0160; Far from the life in A ceasing, the life in A doubled!&#0160; So human person A became nonexistent without dying.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2c.&#0160; The third way is by fusion.&#0160; Two dudes enter the Person Splicer from the east and exit to the west one dude.&#0160; The entrants have ceased to exist without dying.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2d.&#0160; The fourth way is theological.&#0160; Everything other than God depends on God for its very existence&#0160;at every moment of its existence.&#0160; If God were to &#39;pull the plug&#39; ontologically speaking on the entire universe of contingent beings, then at that instant all human persons would cease to exist without dying.&#0160; They would not suffer the process or the event of dying&#0160; but would enter nonexistence nonetheless.&#0160; Because they had not died, they could not be properly said to be dead.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Therefore,<em> pace <\/em>the Peripatetic,<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">3.&#0160; Being dead and being nonexistent are not the same&#0160; &#8212; not even for living things.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">(Time consumed in composing this post: 40 minutes.&#0160;<\/span>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In general, being dead and being nonexistent are not the same &#39;property&#39; for an obvious reason: only that which was once alive can properly be said to be dead, and not everything was once alive.&#0160; Nevertheless, it might be thought that, for living things, to be is to be alive, and not to be is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2010\/12\/11\/being-dead-and-being-nonexistent-or-how-to-cease-to-exist-without-dying\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Being Dead and Being Nonexistent, or:  How to Cease to Exist without Dying&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,184,142],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aristotle","category-death-and-immortality","category-existence"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11065"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11065\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}