{"id":10971,"date":"2011-01-31T06:25:27","date_gmt":"2011-01-31T06:25:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/01\/31\/does-a-cube-have-12-edges\/"},"modified":"2011-01-31T06:25:27","modified_gmt":"2011-01-31T06:25:27","slug":"does-a-cube-have-12-edges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/01\/31\/does-a-cube-have-12-edges\/","title":{"rendered":"Does a Cube Have 12 Edges?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Well of course.&#0160; In reality every cube has 12 edges.&#0160;But one could think of a cube without thinking of something that has 12 edges, and indeed without thinking&#0160;of something that lacks 12 edges.&#0160; If you know what a cube is, and I ask you, &quot;How many&#0160;edges does a cube have,&quot; you&#0160;might reply, &quot;I don&#39;t know.&quot;&#0160; During this exchange you are most assuredly thinking&#0160;of a cube, but a cube indeterminate in respect of the property of having 12 edges.&#0160; What you have before your mind is an incomplete object, one that, because incomplete, cannot exist.&#0160; Your thought has an intentional object, but it is an object that does not exist.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Another example.&#0160; Peter shows up at my door.&#0160; I note that he is wearing a brown leather vest.&#0160; Now anything made of leather must be made of cow leather or horse leather or alligator leather or . . . .&#0160; But the leather vest that is before my mind as the object of my visual experience is indeterminate with respect to type of leather.&#0160; What is before my mind is an&#0160;intentional object.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Peter&#39;s vest is brown, and in reality everything brown is colored.&#0160; But the intentional object of my visual experiencing is brown but not colored.&#0160; Extracting the principle, we may erect the following thesis:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><strong>Non-Closure Under Property-Entailment<\/strong>:&#0160; Intentional objects, reflecting as they do the finitude of the human mind, are not closed under property-entailment.&#0160;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">It follows from this principle that no merely intentional object exists.&#0160; (For everything that exists is complete.)&#0160; But that is not to say that they are denizens of Meinong&#39;s realm of<em> Aussersein<\/em>.&#0160; Talk of merely intentional objects does not commit one to Meinongianism.&#0160; One could take the line that merely intentional objects are &quot;ontically heteronomous&quot; to borrow a phrase from Roman Ingarden: their existence is parasitic upon the existence of the mental acts whose intentional objects they are.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Now there are problems with this sketch of a theory of intentional objects, but it is not an obviously senseless or incoherent theory.&#0160; So I suspect Edward of London feigns incomprehension when he says he doesn&#39;t understand it.&#0160; Does he have a better theory?<\/span>&#0160;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well of course.&#0160; In reality every cube has 12 edges.&#0160;But one could think of a cube without thinking of something that has 12 edges, and indeed without thinking&#0160;of something that lacks 12 edges.&#0160; If you know what a cube is, and I ask you, &quot;How many&#0160;edges does a cube have,&quot; you&#0160;might reply, &quot;I don&#39;t know.&quot;&#0160; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/01\/31\/does-a-cube-have-12-edges\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Does a Cube Have 12 Edges?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[100],"tags":[748],"class_list":["post-10971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-intentionality","tag-intentionality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10971"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10971\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}