{"id":10725,"date":"2011-05-03T13:02:44","date_gmt":"2011-05-03T13:02:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/05\/03\/on-joy-at-osamas-demise-dennis-prager-responds-to-me-on-the-air\/"},"modified":"2011-05-03T13:02:44","modified_gmt":"2011-05-03T13:02:44","slug":"on-joy-at-osamas-demise-dennis-prager-responds-to-me-on-the-air","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/05\/03\/on-joy-at-osamas-demise-dennis-prager-responds-to-me-on-the-air\/","title":{"rendered":"On Joy at Osama&#8217;s Demise: Dennis Prager Responds to Me on the Air"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">It&#39;s been an interesting morning.&#0160; At 10:30 AM I noticed that my traffic was way up for the day.&#0160; And then at 11:12 AM I heard Dennis Prager reading on the air the first paragraph of <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2011\/05\/it-is-good-that-osama-is-dead-but-no-gloating.html\" target=\"_self\">a post&#0160;of mine from yesterday <\/a>in which I express my disappointment&#0160;at Prager for rejoicing over Osama bin Laden&#39;s death when the appropriate response, as it seems to me, is to be glad that the al-Qaeda head is out of commission, but without gleeful expressions of pleasure.&#0160; That&#39;s <em>Schadenfreude <\/em>and to my mind morally dubious.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">(Even more strange is that before&#0160;Prager read from my blog, I had a precognitive sense that he was going to do so.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">In his response, Prager pointed out that the Jews rejoiced when the Red Sea closed around the Egyptians, and that this rejoicing was&#0160; pleasing to God.&#0160; (See <em>Exodus<\/em> 15)&#0160; Apparently that settled the matter for Prager.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">And then it dawned on me.&#0160; Prager&#0160;was brought up a Jew, I was brought up a Christian.&#0160; I had a similar problem with my Jewish friend Peter&#0160;Lupu.&#0160; In a carefully&#0160;crafted post, <a href=\"http:\/\/maverickphilosopher.typepad.com\/maverick_philosopher\/2009\/04\/can-mere-thoughts-be-morally-wrong.html\" target=\"_self\">Can Mere Thoughts be Morally Wrong?<\/a>, I argued for a thesis that &#0160;I consider well-nigh self-evident and not in need of argument, namely, that some mere thoughts are morally objectionable.&#0160; The exact sense of this thesis is explained and qualified in the post.&#0160; But to my amazement, I couldn&#39;t get Peter to accept it despite my four arguments.&#0160; And he still doesn&#39;t accept it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Later on, it was Prager who got me to see what was going on in my discussion with Peter.&#0160; He said something about how, in Judaism, it is the action that counts, not the thought or intention.&#0160; Aha!&#0160; But now a certain skepticism rears its head:&#0160; is Peter trapped in his childhood training, and me in mine?&#0160; Are our arguments nothing but <em>ex post facto <\/em>rationalizations of what we believe, not for good reasons, but on the basis of inculcation?&#0160; (The etymology of &#39;inculcation&#39; is telling: the beliefs that were inculcated in us were stamped into us as if by a heel, L. <em>calx,<\/em> when we were impressionable youths.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The text that so impressed me as a boy and impresses me even more now is<em> Matt<\/em>. 5: 27-28:&#0160; &quot;You have heard that it was said, <em>You shall not commit adultery.<\/em> [Ex. 20:14, Deut. 5:18]&#0160; But I say to you that&#0160;anyone who so much as looks with lust at a woman has already committed adultery with her in his heart.&quot;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Not that I think that Prager or Peter are right.&#0160; No, I think I&#39;m right.&#0160; I think&#0160; Christianity is morally superior to Judaism: it supersedes Judaism, preserving what is good in it while correcting what is bad.&#0160; Christianity goes to&#0160;the <em>heart<\/em>&#0160;of the matter.&#0160; Our hearts are foul, which is why our words and deeds are foul.&#0160; Of course I have a right to&#0160;my opinion and I can back it with arguments.&#0160; And you would have to be a&#0160; liberal of the worst sort to think that there&#0160;is anything &#39;hateful&#39; in what I just wrote about Christianity being morally superior to Judaism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">But still there is the specter of skepticism which is not easy to lay.&#0160; I think we just have to admit that reason is weak and that the moral and other intuitions from which we reason are frail reeds indeed.&#0160; This should make us tolerant of differences.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">But toleration has limits.&#0160; We cannot tolerate the fanatically intolerant.&#0160; So, while not rejoicing over any man&#39;s death or presuming to know &#8212; what <em>chutzpah<\/em>! &#8211;&#0160; where any man stands in the judgment of God, I am glad that Osama has been removed from our midst.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#39;s been an interesting morning.&#0160; At 10:30 AM I noticed that my traffic was way up for the day.&#0160; And then at 11:12 AM I heard Dennis Prager reading on the air the first paragraph of a post&#0160;of mine from yesterday in which I express my disappointment&#0160;at Prager for rejoicing over Osama bin Laden&#39;s death &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/05\/03\/on-joy-at-osamas-demise-dennis-prager-responds-to-me-on-the-air\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;On Joy at Osama&#8217;s Demise: Dennis Prager Responds to Me on the Air&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[92,32,60,119,166,139,375],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-autobiographical","category-current-affairs","category-ethics","category-islamism","category-new-testament","category-religion","category-terrorism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}