{"id":10554,"date":"2011-07-09T14:10:01","date_gmt":"2011-07-09T14:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/07\/09\/were-the-greatest-philosophers-theists-or-atheists\/"},"modified":"2011-07-09T14:10:01","modified_gmt":"2011-07-09T14:10:01","slug":"were-the-greatest-philosophers-theists-or-atheists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/07\/09\/were-the-greatest-philosophers-theists-or-atheists\/","title":{"rendered":"Were the Greatest Philosophers Theists or Atheists?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">To answer the title question, we must first answer the logically prior question as to who the greatest philosophers were. But this presupposes an answer to the equally vexing question of who counts as&#0160; a philosopher. Heidegger published two fat volumes on Nietzsche, but dismissed Kierkegaard as a mere &quot;religious writer.&quot; Others will go him one better, dismissing both Kierkegaard and Nietzsche &#8212; and Heidegger as well. Was Aquinas a philosopher?&#0160; Or was he merely a brilliant man who used philosophical tools to shore up beliefs of an extraphilosophical provenience, beliefs that he wouldn&#39;t have abandoned even if he hadn&#39;t able to find philosophical justifications for them?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Note also that the question as to who counts as a gen-u-ine philosopher presupposes an answer to the hairy and hoary question as to what philosophy is.&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">In any case, here is my ranking of the philosophers that made it onto&#0160;a BBC shortlist from a few years ago.&#0160;The ranking is mine; the list is from the BBC.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">1. Plato (c. 429-347 BC) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2. Aristotle (384-322 BC) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">3. Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225-1274) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">4. Ren\u00e9 Descartes (1596-1650) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">5. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">6. Socrates (c. 470-399 BC) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">7. Benedictus de Spinoza&#0160; (1632-1677) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">8. David Hume (1711-1776) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">9. Epicurus (341-270 BC) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">10. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">11. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">12. Arthur&#0160; Schopenhauer (1788-1860) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">13. S\u00f8ren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">14. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">15. Karl Marx (1818-1883) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">16. Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872-1970) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">17. Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">18. Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">19. Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">20.&#0160; Karl Raimund Popper (1902-1994)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Here are my criteria in order of importance:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">1. Truth of the philosopher&#39;s conclusions<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">2. Belief in reason&#39;s power to discover some of the ultimate truth <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">3. Rigor of argumentation <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">4. Appreciation of the limits of reason <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">5. Depth and centrality of the problems addressed <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">6. Breadth and systematicity of vision <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">7. Originality <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">8. Long-term influence<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">The first seven philosophers on my list are great philosophers, the rest are important but not great. Kierkegaard, for example, though original and influential, and (too) appreciative of the limits of reason falls short on the other criteria.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">It goes without saying that my ordering of the philosophers, my criteria, and <em>their<\/em> ordering are highly subjective. They reflect my interests, my biases, and my own philosophical conclusions. For example, my primary interest in a philosopher is not in his literary merit. If that is your primary interest, then you will probably rank Kierkegaard and Nietzsche ahead of Kant. Indeed, if you do not, then you have very poor taste!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">You will notice that I am biased toward the rationalists. Thus all the philosophers I call great are either rationalists, or like Aristotle and Kant, have a strong rationalist side to their thinking. And when I&#0160;&#0160; list truth as my <em>numero uno <\/em>criterion, it is clear that that is truth as I take it to be.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">On the score of truth,&#0160; Nietzsche really falls short. For not only is there little if any philosophical truth in his writings, the poor soul denies the very existence of truth.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">When one studies the first seven on the list, one actually learns something about the world. But when one reads Nietzsche and (later) Wittgenstein, one learns highly original and fascinating opinions that <\/span><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">have little or no chance of being true. One learns from them, and from some others on the list, how NOT to do philosophy. But that too is something worth knowing! So they have their place and their use.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Now to our question whether the greatest philosophers were theists or atheists. The greatest philosophers on my list are Plato, Aristotle, &#0160;Aquinas, Descartes, Kant, Socrates, and Spinoza. All of these are theists&#0160; of one sort or another. &#0160;But even if Spinoza is excluded, that leaves six out of seven. And if you argue that Aristotle&#39;s Prime Mover is not God in any serious sense, then I&#39;ve still got five out of seven.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">If you say I rigged my list so that theists come out on top, I will deny the charge and argue that I used independent criteria (listed above). But if you disagree my assessment, I will consider it par for the course.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To answer the title question, we must first answer the logically prior question as to who the greatest philosophers were. But this presupposes an answer to the equally vexing question of who counts as&#0160; a philosopher. Heidegger published two fat volumes on Nietzsche, but dismissed Kierkegaard as a mere &quot;religious writer.&quot; Others will go him &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/07\/09\/were-the-greatest-philosophers-theists-or-atheists\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Were the Greatest Philosophers Theists or Atheists?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[191,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atheism-and-theism","category-metaphilosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10554\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}