{"id":10167,"date":"2011-11-17T09:39:54","date_gmt":"2011-11-17T09:39:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/11\/17\/reininger-contra-buddhism\/"},"modified":"2011-11-17T09:39:54","modified_gmt":"2011-11-17T09:39:54","slug":"reininger-contra-buddhism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/11\/17\/reininger-contra-buddhism\/","title":{"rendered":"Reininger Contra Buddhism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">Robert Reininger, <em>Philosophie des Erlebens<\/em>, p. 227:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; <em>Gegen Buddhismus: Trishna nicht ertoeten (ausloeschen), sondern durch<\/em><\/span><br \/><em><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; Ueberhoehung in den Dienst des Vernunftwillens stellen &#8212; sonst fehlt<\/span><\/em><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><em>&#0160;&#0160; diesem die lebendige Kraft, die nur der Daseinsbejahung eignet <\/em>(A 751,<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; 1932).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; Against Buddhism: Trishna is not to be killed or extinguished, but<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; elevated and placed in the service of the rational will. Without this<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; sublimation, the rational will lacks the vital force&#0160;appropriate to&#0160;the<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; affirmation of existence. (tr. BV)<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">&#0160;&#0160; <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\"><em>Trishna<\/em> is Sanskrit for desire, thirst. Central to Buddhism is the notion that the suffering and general unsatisfactoriness of life is rooted in desire, and that salvation is to be had by the&#0160;&#0160;extirpation of desire. Reininger&#39;s point is one with which I wholly&#0160; agree. The goal ought not be the extinction of desire, but its sublimation. Desire as such is not the problem; the problem is misdirected desire. Properly channeled and sublimated, desire provides the motive force for the rational will.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: georgia,palatino;\">See my &quot;No Self? A Look at a Buddhist Argument,&quot;<em> International Philosophical Quarterly<\/em>, vol. 42, no. 4 (December 2002), pp. 453-466.) <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Robert Reininger, Philosophie des Erlebens, p. 227: &#0160;&#0160; Gegen Buddhismus: Trishna nicht ertoeten (ausloeschen), sondern durch&#0160;&#0160; Ueberhoehung in den Dienst des Vernunftwillens stellen &#8212; sonst fehlt&#0160;&#0160; diesem die lebendige Kraft, die nur der Daseinsbejahung eignet (A 751,&#0160;&#0160; 1932). &#0160;&#0160; Against Buddhism: Trishna is not to be killed or extinguished, but&#0160;&#0160; elevated and placed in the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/2011\/11\/17\/reininger-contra-buddhism\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Reininger Contra Buddhism&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[269,531],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10167","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-buddhism","category-translations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10167"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10167\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maverickphilosopher.blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}